Posted Feb 5th 2013 11:58AM
Back in October, we compared the relative merits of two new and very good small crossovers: the 2013 Ford Escape Vs. 2013 Mazda CX-5. The CX-5 we tested then had Mazda's 2.0-litre Skyactiv-G engine under its hood, and it managed to just edge out the EcoBoosted Ford despite being down by some 23 horsepower and 34 pound-feet of torque. Had it been available, the 2.5-litre Skyactiv engine that we recently had the opportunity to try out in the 2014 Mazda CX-5, it may have made that comparison even easier to call in the Japanese CUV's favour.
Clearly, if you're in the market for a reasonably sized crossover, the CX-5 should, at the very least, be on your test-drive list. The new engine offering will let buyers opt for a stronger powerplant, with 184 hp and 185 lb-ft on tap. On our second day in Austin's Hill Country – the first was spent quick-spinning the 2014 Mazda6, you'll recall – we covered a couple of hundred kilometres and put the new CX-5 through its paces; here's what we turned up.
- The extra half-litre of Skyactiv displacement, resulting in 29 more horsepower and 35 more pound-feet of torque than in the 2.0-litre model, is satisfying in this new CX-5. With the larger engine, the CX-5's 0-60 mph (96 km/h) time falls to about 7.2 seconds (Mazda's estimate) from just under 9 seconds in the 2.0-litre version. Those numbers are borne out in real-world feel, too, where the new CX-5 absolutely feels quicker away from a stoplight and less strained when passing slower folks at highway speeds. The 2.5 engine sounds a bit better, too – offering a mildly enthusiastic growl up around 5,000 rpm and onward.
- Every other piece of the dynamic driving experience is more or less exactly the same with the 2.5-litre engine as it was with the smaller powerplant. Mazda only had CX-5s with the new engine on hand at our drive event in Austin, and it's possible that driving both versions, back-to-back, could reveal some mild handling differences. But with only a few months separating our last seat time in the 2.0-litre car from this drive, we feel safe saying that the more-potent CX-5 is every bit the nimble handler as its slightly lighter sibling.
- With the added thrust and equal handling taken as read then, what exactly is the give/get situation relative to the smaller-engine CX-5? The larger-engined vehicle gains about 100 pounds (45 kg), trim-for-trim. The 2.0-litre is the only 2014 CX-5 that can be had with Mazda's very good six-speed manual transmission, meanwhile, though product planners hinted that we may be seeing a 2.5L/6MT combo later in the model year. (We know from the Mazda6 that the engine and manual transmission work nicely together.) Impressively, the 2.5L CX-5 still manages to deliver 9.5 L/100km (25 mpg) city, versus the 9 L/100km (26 mpg) rating of the smaller 2.0L displacement engine, and the highway ratings stay exactly the same on both 7.4 L/100km (32 mpg). Towing capacity stays steady at a modest 2,000-pound (907 kg) maximum for all CX-5 models.
- With such stellar comparative specifications versus its 2.0-litre brother, the determining factor for opting-in to a 2.5-litre CX-5 is essentially only cost. For 2014, Mazda is only offering the 2.0-litre engine in GX trim (read: base) models – both all-wheel-drive and front-wheel-drive flavors – while the 2.5-liter engine starts at the plusher GS trim in both driveline configurations. That means while a true apples-to-apples comparison isn't possible, you will have to pony up about $4,500 to get into the larger mill. A front-wheel-drive CX-5 GX 2.0 6AT starts at $24,195, while the FWD CX-5 GS 2.5 6AT asks $28,650 (all models have identical destination charges). For AWD models, the difference between the GX and GS is a $2,755 gap – MSRPs of $27,895 (GX) and $30,650 (GS), respectively.
- Here's a little model-year 2014 trivia for future members of the CX-5 enthusiast clubs: This year sees three new colors (Soul Red, Jet Black, Meteor Gray) replacing three old colors (Zeal Red, Black Mica, Metropolitan Gray). Last year's blue plastic engine cover has been replaced with a black plastic engine cover. Got all of that? We'll have a quiz next week.